DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Escudo vs 2004 Chevrolet Classic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChevrolet
EscudoModelClassic
2004Model year2004
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
140 HPPower141 HP
186 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size205/65 R15

Dimensions

—Length4835 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1425 mm
—Weight1375 Kg
—Wheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Escudo and 2004 Chevrolet Classic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…