DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Escudo vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSeat
EscudoModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats7
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4617 mm
—Width1810 mm
—Height1728 mm
—Weight1754 Kg
—Wheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Escudo and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…