2000 • Suzuki
Cultus
Suzuki Cultus 1.3 4 WD (3 dr) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Suzuki Cultus vs 1996 Rover Maestro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
Maestro
Rover Maestro 1.3 (69 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Cultus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki CultusSpecificationRover Maestro
SuzukiMakeRover
CultusModelMaestro
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Suzuki CultusSpecificationRover Maestro
13,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
162 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
68 HPPower69 HP
99 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki CultusSpecificationRover Maestro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki CultusSpecificationRover Maestro
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R13 STyre size155/80 R13 79 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki CultusSpecificationRover Maestro
3745 mmLength4000 mm
1585 mmWidth1695 mm
1350 mmHeight1430 mm
835 KgWeight925 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2510 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Suzuki Cultus and 1996 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Cultus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…