DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Suzuki Ciaz vs 2017 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeNissan
CiazModelMicra
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1373 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
92 HPPower90 HP
130 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption3,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,1 lt
—Average consumption3,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength3999 mm
1730 mmWidth1743 mm
1475 mmHeight1455 mm
1010-1030 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Suzuki Ciaz and 2017 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…