DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Ciaz vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRenault
CiazModelMegane
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,4 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1373 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
92 HPPower90 HP
130 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption4,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,4 lt
—Average consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4359 mm
1730 mmWidth1814 mm
1475 mmHeight1447 mm
1010-1030 KgWeight1205 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2669 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Ciaz and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…