DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Ciaz vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRenault
CiazModelClio
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1373 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
92 HPPower90 HP
130 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
—Average consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 EDC
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4267 mm
1730 mmWidth1732 mm
1475 mmHeight1445 mm
1010-1030 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Ciaz and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…