DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Baleno vs 2000 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Baleno

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeNissan
BalenoModelBluebird
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
101 HPPower110 HP
134 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4470 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1445 mm
920 KgWeight—
2480 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Baleno and 2000 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Baleno leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…