1997 • Subaru
Vivio
Subaru Vivio 1997Overall Score51.5/100
1997 Subaru Vivio vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru VivioSpecificationMazda Scrum
SubaruMakeMazda
VivioModelScrum
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3/5Doors4
Performance
Subaru VivioSpecificationMazda Scrum
133 km/hTop speed125 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
42 HPPower42 HP
52 NmTorque57 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru VivioSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank37 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru VivioSpecificationMazda Scrum
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size145/80 R12 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru VivioSpecificationMazda Scrum
3295 mmLength3295 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1385 mmHeight1870 mm
700 KgWeight780 Kg
2310 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Subaru Vivio and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…