DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Subaru Vivio vs 2000 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Tico

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeDaewoo
VivioModelTico
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
138 km/hTop speed143 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement796 cc
64 HPPower48 HP
84 NmTorque64 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank30 lt
8 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size135 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3295 mmLength3340 mm
1395 mmWidth1400 mm
1375 mmHeight1395 mm
625 KgWeight640 Kg
2310 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Subaru Vivio and 2000 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…