DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Subaru Tribeca vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Tribeca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
TribecaModelCX-9
2014Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3630 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
258 HPPower273 HP
350 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank76 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
11,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R18Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength5232 mm
1880 mmWidth1935 mm
1685 mmHeight1727 mm
1908 KgWeight1958 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Subaru Tribeca and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Tribeca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…