DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Subaru R2 vs 1999 Mazda Az-offroad Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru R2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
R2ModelAz-offroad
2003Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
84 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1520 mmHeight1680 mm
770 KgWeight960 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Subaru R2 and 1999 Mazda Az-offroad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…