DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Subaru Outback vs 2009 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMitsubishi
OutbackModelL 200
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
199 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
173 HPPower136 HP
229 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4730 mmLength5000 mm
1770 mmWidth1750 mm
1545 mmHeight1775 mm
1485 KgWeight1935 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Subaru Outback and 2009 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…