2010 • Subaru
Outback
Subaru Outback 2.5i (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Subaru Outback vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Subaru Outback
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru OutbackSpecificationFord Ranger
SubaruMakeFord
OutbackModelRanger
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typePick-up
4+1Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru OutbackSpecificationFord Ranger
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
229 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru OutbackSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru OutbackSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/60 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru OutbackSpecificationFord Ranger
4775 mmLength5075 mm
1820 mmWidth1805 mm
1605 mmHeight1745 mm
1608 KgWeight—
2740 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Subaru Outback and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…