DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Subaru Outback vs 2005 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeJaguar
OutbackModelS-type
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed228 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
250 HPPower200 HP
339 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4795 mmLength4861 mm
1770 mmWidth1819 mm
1605 mmHeight1441 mm
1550 KgWeight1620 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Subaru Outback and 2005 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…