DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Subaru Libero vs 2000 ZAZ 1103 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeZAZ
LiberoModel1103
1996Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
6Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
128 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1190 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
54 HPPower58 HP
97 NmTorque90 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank38 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/82 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3525 mmLength3980 mm
1415 mmWidth1564 mm
1925 mmHeight1425 mm
1040 KgWeight790 Kg
1885 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Subaru Libero and 2000 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…