DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Subaru Impreza vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ImprezaModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
205 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
156 HPPower165 HP
196 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
LineartronicGears6
205/50R17 89VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4555 mm
1775 mmWidth1840 mm
1480 mmHeight1710 mm
1379 KgWeight1315 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Subaru Impreza and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…