DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Subaru Impreza vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMitsubishi
ImprezaModelCarisma
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
172 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4435 mm
1690 mmWidth1710 mm
1415 mmHeight1405 mm
1115 KgWeight1080 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Subaru Impreza and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…