DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Subaru Forester vs 2010 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeBuick
ForesterModelRegal
2010Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
184 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
171 HPPower200 HP
229 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
225/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4831 mm
1780 mmWidth1857 mm
1700 mmHeight1483 mm
1495 KgWeight1641 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2738 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Subaru Forester and 2010 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…