2006 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5i (158HP) 2006Overall Score63.25/100
2006 Subaru Forester vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 16V (145 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
SubaruMakeFord
ForesterModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
CrossoverBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
197 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
158 HPPower145 HP
186 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption10 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
4450 mmLength4330 mm
1735 mmWidth1820 mm
1590 mmHeight1600 mm
1360 KgWeight1294 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Subaru Forester and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…