2005 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5i (158HP) 2005Overall Score63.25/100
2005 Subaru Forester vs 2005 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.0 i 16V (145 Hp) 2005Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Atenza
SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModelAtenza
2005Model year2005
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Atenza
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
158 HPPower145 HP
186 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Atenza
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Atenza
4450 mmLength4745 mm
1735 mmWidth1780 mm
1590 mmHeight1440 mm
1360 KgWeight1375 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Subaru Forester and 2005 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…