DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Subaru Forester vs 2005 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModel6
2005Model year2005
CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
197 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
158 HPPower147 HP
186 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/70 R15Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4710 mm
1735 mmWidth1780 mm
1590 mmHeight1480 mm
1360 KgWeight1370 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Subaru Forester and 2005 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…