DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Subaru Forester vs 2010 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeSubaru
ForesterModelForester
2009Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeCrossover
5Seats4+1
5Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
197 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
196 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4560 mm
1735 mmWidth1780 mm
1590 mmHeight1700 mm
1390 KgWeight1570 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Subaru Forester and 2010 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…