DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Subaru Forester vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower165 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4555 mm
1795 mmWidth1840 mm
1735 mmHeight1710 mm
1562 KgWeight1315 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Subaru Forester and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…