2005 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (177 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
2005 Subaru Forester vs 2012 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.5 dCi (110 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.
68.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationRenault Megane
SubaruMakeRenault
ForesterModelMegane
2005Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationRenault Megane
8,3 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
177 HPPower110 HP
245 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationRenault Megane
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16 92H; 205/55 R17 91H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationRenault Megane
4450 mmLength4295 mm
1735 mmWidth1808 mm
1585 mmHeight1471 mm
1410 KgWeight1215 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2641 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Subaru Forester and 2012 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…