DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Subaru Forester vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeFord
ForesterModelFocus
2002Model year2003
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
198 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
170 HPPower172 HP
240 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4270 mm
1735 mmWidth1699 mm
1580 mmHeight1430 mm
1445 KgWeight1270 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Subaru Forester and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…