DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Subaru Forester vs 2010 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeSubaru
ForesterModelForester
2011Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
186 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4485 mm
1780 mmWidth1735 mm
1700 mmHeight1590 mm
1540 KgWeight1390 Kg
—Wheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Subaru Forester and 2010 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…