DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 SsangYong Rexton vs 2014 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
RextonModelV40
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
173 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
155 HPPower177 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
78 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/75 R16; 255/60 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4755 mmLength4369 mm
1900 mmWidth1802 mm
1785-1840 mmHeight1445 mm
1901-1965 KgWeight1398 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 SsangYong Rexton and 2014 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…