DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Rexton vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
RextonModelXC90
2012Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2696 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
163 HPPower210 HP
345 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4798 mm
1870 mmWidth1898 mm
1830 mmHeight1743 mm
1815 KgWeight2080 Kg
2828 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Rexton and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…