DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 SsangYong Rexton vs 2001 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeSaab
RextonModel9-3
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
209 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4629 mm
1870 mmWidth1711 mm
1760 mmHeight1428 mm
1815 KgWeight1320 Kg
2828 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 SsangYong Rexton and 2001 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…