DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 SsangYong Rexton vs 2016 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
RextonModelXC70
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
175 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
155 HPPower163 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
78 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
18Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4755 mmLength4838 mm
1900 mmWidth1870 mm
1840 mmHeight1604 mm
1925 kgWeight—
250 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2815 mm

Additional Features

SsangYong RextonDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Volvo XC70

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 SsangYong Rexton and 2016 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…