DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Musso vs 1999 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGAZ
MussoModel31
2003Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

21,0 s0–100 km/h23,0 s
145 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
190 NmTorque172 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4870 mm
1850 mmWidth1800 mm
1720 mmHeight1422 mm
1830 KgWeight1401 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Musso and 1999 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…