DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 SsangYong Musso vs 2000 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeDaewoo
MussoModelMusso
1996Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

21,0 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
145 km/hTop speed143 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
95 HPPower98 HP
190 NmTorque191 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15 STyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4640 mm
1850 mmWidth1864 mm
1720 mmHeight1735 mm
1830 KgWeight1815 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 SsangYong Musso and 2000 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…