DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 SsangYong Musso vs 2002 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

69.25–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeAudi
MussoModelA3
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
175 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2299 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
220 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
14,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4152 mm
1905 mmWidth1735 mm
1735 mmHeight1427 mm
1890 KgWeight1200 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 SsangYong Musso and 2002 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…