DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 SsangYong Musso vs 2005 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGreat Wall
MussoModelHover CUV
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
176 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
140 HPPower130 HP
204 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4620 mm
1864 mmWidth1800 mm
1735 mmHeight1775 mm
1895 KgWeight1830 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 SsangYong Musso and 2005 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…