DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 SsangYong Kyron vs 2013 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMitsubishi
KyronModelASX
2013Model year2013
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
2299 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4295 mm
1880 mmWidth1770 mm
1755 mmHeight1625 mm
—Weight1360 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 SsangYong Kyron and 2013 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…