DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 SsangYong Korando vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeOpel
KorandoModelCampo
1996Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

23,4 s0–100 km/h23,4 s
137 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
95 HPPower76 HP
190 NmTorque160 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4980 mm
1841 mmWidth1690 mm
1940 mmHeight1710 mm
1785 KgWeight—
2480 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 SsangYong Korando and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…