DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 SsangYong Korando vs 2002 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeDaewoo
KorandoModelRezzo
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
154 km/hTop speed104 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
126 HPPower128 HP
177 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4260 mmLength4350 mm
1841 mmWidth1750 mm
1840 mmHeight1580 mm
1750 KgWeight1392 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 SsangYong Korando and 2002 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…