DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2017 Alfa Romeo 4C Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 4C

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

89.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeAlfa Romeo
4 SerisiModel4C
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

5,8 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed258 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
252 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
ATTransmissionTCT
17Tyre size18
NoABSNo

Dimensions

4640 mmLength3989 mm
1825 mmWidth1864 mm
1404 mmHeight1183 mm
1650 kgWeight895 kg
445 ltLuggage capacity110 lt

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 BMW 4 Serisi and 2017 Alfa Romeo 4C approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 4C leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…