DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Chairman vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeFord
ChairmanModelRanger
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
195 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2799 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
197 HPPower200 HP
265 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
83 ltFuel tank80 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 T-tronicGears6
245/45 R19Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5135 mmLength5359 mm
1895 mmWidth1850 mm
1495 mmHeight1815 mm
1949 KgWeight2073 Kg
2970 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Chairman and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…