DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Chairman vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
ChairmanModelS40
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
197 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
220 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4468 mm
1825 mmWidth1770 mm
1465 mmHeight1452 mm
1700 KgWeight1296 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Chairman and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…