DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2018 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeKia
4 SerisiModelOptima
2018Model year2018
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
136 HPPower134 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4855 mm
1825 mmWidth—
1404 mmHeight1465 mm
1650 kgWeight1590 Kg
445 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 BMW 4 Serisi and 2018 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…