2002 • Smart
Roadster
Smart Roadster 0.7 i (82 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
2002 Smart Roadster vs 2005 Smart Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Smart
Roadster
Smart Roadster 0.7 i (61 Hp) 2005Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Smart Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart RoadsterSpecificationSmart Roadster
SmartMakeSmart
RoadsterModelRoadster
2002Model year2005
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Smart RoadsterSpecificationSmart Roadster
10,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement698 cc
82 HPPower61 HP
110 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart RoadsterSpecificationSmart Roadster
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart RoadsterSpecificationSmart Roadster
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R15Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Smart RoadsterSpecificationSmart Roadster
3427 mmLength3427 mm
1615 mmWidth1615 mm
1207 mmHeight1207 mm
815 KgWeight790 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Smart Roadster and 2005 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…