DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Roadster vs 2004 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSmart
RoadsterModelRoadster
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
160 km/hTop speed175 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement698 cc
61 HPPower82 HP
95 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size185/55 R15

Dimensions

3427 mmLength3427 mm
1615 mmWidth1615 mm
1207 mmHeight1192 mm
790 KgWeight790 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Roadster and 2004 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…