DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Smart Roadster vs 2003 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakePerodua
RoadsterModelKenari
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
160 km/hTop speed140 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement989 cc
61 HPPower56 HP
95 NmTorque88 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size155/65 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength3460 mm
1615 mmWidth1475 mm
1207 mmHeight1665 mm
790 KgWeight845 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Smart Roadster and 2003 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…