2014 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 17.6 kWh (75 Hp) 2014Overall Score35.25/100
2014 Smart Fortwo vs 2012 Citroen C-Zero Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C-Zero
Citroen C-Zero 2012Overall Score34.25/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
35.25–34.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationCitroen C-Zero
SmartMakeCitroen
FortwoModelC-Zero
2014Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
2Doors5
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationCitroen C-Zero
11,5 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
125 km/hTop speed130 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
0 HPPower0 HP
130 NmTorque196 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationCitroen C-Zero
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
1Gears1
—Tyre size145/65 R15 S; 175/55 R15 V
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationCitroen C-Zero
2695 mmLength3475 mm
1559 mmWidth1475 mm
1565 mmHeight1608 mm
920 KgWeight1120 Kg
1867 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Smart Fortwo and 2012 Citroen C-Zero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…