2011 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 1.0i (71 Hp) 2011Overall Score55.5/100
2011 Smart Fortwo vs 2016 Smart Fortwo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.9 (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6.75 points.
55.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
SmartMakeSmart
FortwoModelFortwo
2011Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
145 km/hTop speed165 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement898 cc
71 HPPower109 HP
0 NmTorque170 Nm
—Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6 Twinamic
155/60 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size185/50 R 16; 205/40 R 17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
2695 mmLength2740 mm
1559 mmWidth1663 mm
1542 mmHeight1543 mm
750 KgWeight1040 Kg
1867 mmWheelbase1873 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Smart Fortwo and 2016 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…