DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 4 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points.

75.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeOpel
4 SerisiModelOmega
2014Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
235 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
184 HPPower218 HP
380 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/50 R17 94WTyre size225/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4898 mm
1825 mmWidth1776 mm
1384 mmHeight1455 mm
1680 KgWeight1710 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 BMW 4 Serisi and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 4 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…