DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2013 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeLand Rover
4 SerisiModelFreelander
2013Model year2013
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
240 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
184 HPPower190 HP
380 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4500 mm
1825 mmWidth—
1377 mmHeight1740 mm
1525 KgWeight1805 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW 4 Serisi and 2013 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…