DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Fortwo vs 2005 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSkoda
FortwoModelFabia
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h21,6 s
135 km/hTop speed147 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement997 cc
41 HPPower50 HP
100 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength4220 mm
1515 mmWidth1646 mm
1549 mmHeight1452 mm
805 KgWeight1010 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Fortwo and 2005 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…