DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Smart Fortwo vs 2005 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeRenault
FortwoModelKangoo
2003Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
3Doors4/5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h21,2 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement999 cc
41 HPPower59 HP
100 NmTorque81 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size165/70 R14 C
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength4035 mm
1515 mmWidth1672 mm
1549 mmHeight1835 mm
805 KgWeight—
1812 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Smart Fortwo and 2005 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…